|
|
|
PIXIE BEACH |
|
I see CL growing & I want it to grow. We need more devel/we need the
opp to experience other people/ideas.. |
|
Following a growth plan that was derived from all concerned citizens. |
|
No large commercial developments |
|
|
|
CARR'S SOUTH |
|
Not against reasonable development/subdivisions provided CLR is not the
access and environment is protected |
|
A mix of moderately sized res lots (min l/2 acre)/larger parcels/agri/parkland.
Limited intro of gated adult comm |
|
Grow slowly. Maintain rural atmosphere |
|
By making our surroundings clean & attractive, we will make it a
pleasant place to live |
|
Clean & uncrowded, retaining country atmosphere. Safe places to walk
and cycle |
|
Country atmosphere where there are lots of acreages |
|
Basically we like the community as it. |
|
Residents want and expect infill, not high density |
|
We would love it if the community grew in the areas we mentioned but
remained a safe community |
|
Basically the same, transit, safer roads. If we wanted
growth/change/development we would have chosen Kelowna |
|
Some res.devel/park improvements/transit along Barkley to Oceola/waste
water guidelines/enforced septic tank standards |
|
I applaud Winfield's Town Centre. CL will develop the concept more
abstractly. |
|
|
|
MOBERLY, LAKEPINE, MCCREIGHT, FOREST HILLS |
|
It doesnt need to grow. It is nice as it is. Kelowna is 10 minutes
away. |
|
More parks and recreational development. Responsible residential
development |
|
Development is controlled. No high density until road is improved.
Infilling of vacant land as long as lots are kept large |
|
1 acre minimum properties |
|
Not a big increase in population. Improved roads and infrastructure |
|
More public access to beaches. More parks/beaches. More restaurants/rec
facilities. Well planned high rise condos. |
|
Improved road shoulders. Dual access via Moberly. More public beaches.
Continued family development |
|
Improved roads with dual access. More parks and public beaches.
Continued family oriented development |
|
Continue with low density, two lane road. |
|
I would like to see it grow as large lot development on the hillsides
away from the farmland |
|
Same as now with l/2 ha to ha lots tucked into hillsides. Lots of
greenspace and open space |
|
Limit development. Allow more access to lakeshore and greenspace.
Speed limits on Carr's enforced. |
|
Small home community |
|
We live in a tourist mecca, so lets make it enjoyable for everyone |
|
I would like 10 years to look exactly as it does now |
|
The status quo cannot survive long term, therefore considerable thought
should be exercised in the short term |
|
Winfield core is big enough for business. Leave the res areas/orchards
along. I can't see any reason or need to change |
|
More activities for children/teenagers |
|
CLR upgraded + alternate route. Walking path adjacent to Carr's.
Permanent residents.Water problems solved.Sewer |
|
Like to see a master plan so that developers & residents know
community's future. |
|
We won't be here in 10 years |
|
Parks. Hiking trails. Connecting bike paths. Jogging trails |
|
CL Ward expanded to Oceola. More beach access. Maintain single fam. res.
devel. Pave Commonage. |
|
I hope it is still a safe and clean place to live in. |
|
Blank |
|
It would look much like it does now with a rural feeling. Development
would be mainly residential. |
|
Blank |
|
|
|
CARR'S LANDING |
|
Close to now with some new homes. Upgrade to CLR 1 km at a time as funds
allow. |
|
Not like Glenmore please |
|
A village complete with centre, p.office, hall, sailing club, with less
summer only large home owners |
|
Further develop to existing density. Maintain CLR but no increase
speed/width. Commonage paved to Predator |
|
CL as an upscale res area with amenities such as bike/walking trails,
parks. Not a resort area. |
|
Walking/bike trails, access from Barkley to lake with well planned low
density development |
|
Status quo |
|
Essentially same as now. Changes evolved from community needs. I hope
CLCRA plays major role of incorp of needs |
|
Walking/cycling along CLR. Speed limits enforced. Houses not condos.Not
huge growth. Rural is what is attractive |
|
CLR improved with bike path or alternate route. Land use to accommodate
integrated community. Responsible boating |
|
More permanent residents. Small community centre. Footpath/bikepath on
CLR. Hiking trails connecting to lake |
|
A community with at least a rural aspect. The lake & ecology to remain
as intact as can reasonably be. |
|
Keep rural character. Development contained. Council adhere to plan &
bylaws. Incentives for cleanup/improvements |
|
I would like to see it compulsory for homeowners to dedicate % of land
untouched. Native plants protected. |
|
|
|
WHISKEY COVE |
|
Growth in controlled manner. Higher density in serviced areas while
keeping rural arreas to larger parcels. |
|
Do things right and you will not have to worry. |
|
Very little change |
|
We can see the existing empty properties being built on , but hopefully
complying with rural density |
|
Much the same but there will be more infill housing |
|
Shoping & services in the central core as already underway, to keep
people close to home |
|
Maintain peaceful, rural ecosystem with habitat for abundant wildlife
and clean water- |
|
The municipality should have dense town centre, but that is unlikely as
I see it will continue to sprawl |
|
Restrict growth, maintain status quo |
|
A true community with everyone wokring to make it stronger. Comm
centre/store like a village centre. |
|
There should be core development in Winfield and outlying areas should
be kept rural or develop along Smart Grth guide |
|
Growth is inevitable.CLR not capable, must change . Activity based
development. Network of hiking/biking trails. |
|
|
|
CARR'S LANDING ROAD NORTH |
|
An area where residents can coexist. Less torn apart by petty politics
and negativity. |
|
Controlled growth with lots of public access to water. Proper shoulders
on CLR for walking Walking trails |
|
Quality homes and quality lifestyle |
|
I hope it looks the same with more residences |
|
Growth is inevitable. Plan it well rather than try to shut it down.
Respect the various uses of land in our community |
|
Safe walking along rds and lakeshore. Network of walking trails. An
activity centre/cafe/store |
|
A mix of residences owned by permanent residents - large single fam/condo/townhouse/cluster/agr.
Additional rd access |
|
Like to see community grow/controlled high density/strata/meeting rooms/rec
facil/lake access to our specs |
|
Rural devel/greenspace/wildlife corridors/organic
gardening/farming/clean lake with public access/paths/trails/commcentre |
|
Rural. High density has no place in Carrs. Cater to people who want
rural. CLR safer for driving/walking/biking |
|
Very much as it is now. Not a lot of housing development |
|
|
|
SCHAAD, TOBY, WENTWORTH, MAKI, GABLE |
|
Transit system + local commercial outlet. Accepting alternative housing
concepts. Neighbourhoods for people/nature |
|
Sustainable development |
|
Other than assumed upgrade of infrastructure - none |
|
Cleaner air/improved water quality/waste management/improve roads/dog
parks/community spirit/community halls |
|
Trendy community promoting health/fitness & maintaining beauty of area.
Walkways/bikepaths etc for all ages |
|
Large lots, privacy, greenspace, safe places to walk/run/bike. Pretty
much as is now. |
|
Blank |
|
More infill housing with bike/hiking trails. More lake access. A feeder
bus especially for teenagers. |
|
Local activities linking to participation with other local communities.
Improved road system. |
|
|
|
TERRACE VIEW, CORAL BEACH |
|
If it stayed the same I would be quite content |
|
Infrastructure and amenities which my family and I could enjoy |
|
Most areas of Lake Country have a park for sports except Carr's |
|
As is with regulated rural style devel. including limits on
multifamily/multi lot devel. New devel should be tax/cost neutral |
|
Minimal growth with maintenance of the roads and recreational areas
improved. |
|
It would be nice if there was no change. Houses are getting bigger and
there is more demand for use of the lake |
|
A little larger. More homes/people/traffic. Residents could have an
active hand in way community grows.Be proactive |
|
Limited growth in concert with development of roads and services |
|
Second southern access. Transit. Integration of perm & summer residents
to improve amenities. Pub/store |
|
Keep greenspace, parks, beaches. Moderate growth. |
|
Blank |
|
Rural but more lake/beach activities. Small/medium resort incl
restaurant/marina/accommodation. No industry. |
|
Growth with controlled devel ie water/air protection/roads/sewer & min
impact on agri. Proper infras.to support future devel. |
|
Phased development with substantially improved rds & amenities
sufficient to support the development |
|
Well planned community with mix of acreages & lakefront devel with
friendly, courteous & respectful neighbours |
|
Resurection of Sailing Club & similar rec opportunities.
Bike/walking/nature trails. More boat launches |
|
The lake kept clean for swimming & also so that our water supply does
not become contaminated. |
|
l/2 ac properties to preserve openess. High dens in Winfield. Non
polluting home business. Unpolluted lakes. |
|
|
|
JUNIPER COVE |
|
More houses/people/permanent rsidents. The community will become
busier, noisier and more congested. |
|
Similar to now - small. Reduction in pollutants. Restore shoreline
ecosystems/wildlife habitat protection.Stewardship |
|
|
|
COMMONAGE |
|
Large lots/ greenspace / family orchards/ non polluting lake use - ie
canoes, sailing |
|
1 acre min lots. Homes in the $250,000 range. Stay with as little
growth as possible |
|
Diversity of land use - business/artists/shops/orchards/residents.
Naramata would be a good model.. |
|
Slow growth, with single housing and a good water supply |
|
Slow growth. Road ends developed. |
|
It would be nice if it didnt change too much. Winfield centre is
becoming a town & all the amenities will be close |
|
Its fine the way it is |
|
Similar to now but with sewer, another road access and more acreages
with single family homes |
|
Just the way it is now |
|
Blank |
|
Maintain its rural nature with a community centre and trails joining
beach accesses |
|
More residential |
|
Pretty much the same but with better infrastructure - roads and
utilities |
|
Blank |
|
Natural balance of farms/res. Upgrade road for existing residents - not
to accommodate extra traffic. |
|
|
|
BARKLEY |
|
A rural looking community with greenspace/beach access/safe rds & water.
Commercial area along beach. |
|
We would like to see community grow outside Winfield town center. |
|
I want my community to grow, grow, grow to whatever it takes to make it
fun & safe |
|
More residential development in isolated areas, safer roads, and
municipal water service |
|
Smaller devel as opposed to lrg ones proposed - cluster/wildlife
corridors/trails/beach access. Need to grow to afford amenities |
|
Comm.centre with public/commercial space. Greenspace/wildlife
corridors/habitat protect. Safe bike/walk paths |
|
Current lot size min the same. Walking trails developed. |
|
Basically the same |
|
|
|
CHAROLAISE AREA |
|
Very similar as now. A few more homes in Charolaise if quality of life
remains the same |
|
We would like more rights on our own property |
|
I would like to see more people have rights on their own properties |
|
Residential - providing recreational opportunities for its inhabitants |
|
|
|
ANONYMOUS |
|
Less air pollution from burning. Keep rural. Small store to cut traffic
& pollution. Bike paths. Improve CLR |
|
Rural living. Recreation. Adult retirement place. |
|
|
|
|
|
ADDENDUM
5C |
|
Describe your community as you would like it to look 10 years from now |
|
A well planned, well policed, safe community |
|
One which would allow children/grchildren to establish families here -
now they leave |
|
Devel at measured pace with lots not below l or l/2acre would reduce env.
& sewer pressures and maintain lifestyle. |
|
Well developed residential upgrade with proper planning. Not 'fly by
nighters'. |
|
Preserve and increase orchard and nature retreat areas. Swimming pool. |
|
Well maintained properties/rural environment/avoid noisy outdoor
businesses |
|
Minimal growth. No condos. |
|
Minimal growth |
|
Remain as residential community with safe uncrowded beaches. |
|
Remain as a residential community with safe places for our children. |
More public beach with boat facilities if linked with
greenspace.
|
